Dayward AI

Interview Bank

328 questions total; 1 shown with current filters.

Mastering Codex and the OpenAI Agents SDK in 5 Days

D3 The Responses API and Built-in Tools: Function Calling, Web Search / File Search / Computer Use, Structured Output

  • How does the Responses API differ from Chat Completions, and what are the common pitfalls when migrating?Responses API 和 Chat Completions 的区别是什么?从 Chat Completions 迁移过去最容易踩什么坑?
    Common in ChinaCommon overseasBasic#responses-api#openai#migration

    How to reason about it · think before answering

    1. This tests whether you have actually migrated code, not whether you can recite field names.
    2. Split into three axes: input shape (messages array becomes input plus top-level instructions), output shape (choices becomes typed output items with an output_text helper), and state (stateless becomes store by default plus previous_response_id).
    3. Explain the motivation: a chat-transcript model cannot hold tool actions; items give search, function calls and their outputs distinct types, which is what makes built-in tools possible.
    4. Name three pitfalls: store defaults to true so compliance-sensitive apps must disable it; output is an array, so read output_text or walk message items; tool results move from role tool messages to function_call_output items keyed by call_id.
    5. Expect the follow-up: previous_response_id versus self-managed history? Prototypes take the former; production usually keeps its own history for audit and recovery, or mixes both.

    分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答

    1. 这题考的是你有没有真迁移过,而不是能不能背出字段名。只答「新接口更强」会被判为看过文档没写过代码。
    2. 拆成三个维度:输入形态(messages 数组变成 input 加顶层 instructions)、输出形态(choices 变成按类型排列的 output items,SDK 给 output_text 助手)、状态管理(无状态变成默认 store 加 previous_response_id)。
    3. 再说为什么要改:聊天记录模型装不下工具动作;items 让搜索、函数调用、回填各有自己的类型,这是内置工具能接进来的前提。
    4. 迁移坑给三条:默认 store 为 true 意味着数据会被存下来,合规场景要显式关掉;output 是数组不是单个消息,取文本要用 output_text 或遍历 message item;函数调用的回填从 role 为 tool 的消息变成 function_call_output item,call_id 要对上。
    5. 可预期的追问:previous_response_id 和自己维护历史怎么选?原型用前者省事,生产多半自己落一份历史做审计与恢复,或两者混用。

    Key points

    • Input: messages become input plus top-level instructions; output: choices become typed output items plus output_text
    • State: store defaults to true and previous_response_id chains turns without resending history
    • The motivation is distinct item types for tool actions, enabling built-in tools
    • Pitfalls: store on by default, output is an array, tool results go back as function_call_output keyed by call_id

    答题要点

    • 输入:messages 变 input 加顶层 instructions;输出:choices 变按类型排列的 output items 与 output_text
    • 状态:默认 store 为 true,用 previous_response_id 接上一轮,不再每轮重发历史
    • 改的动机是给工具动作独立的 item 类型,内置工具由此接入
    • 迁移坑:store 默认开、output 是数组、回填要用 function_call_output 且 call_id 对上