Interview Bank
328 questions total; 2 shown with current filters.
CourseAllFrom Frontend Engineer to Agent Engineer in 30 DaysPrompt Engineering From Scratch in 5 DaysMastering Claude: From Conversation to Claude Code in 5 DaysMastering Codex and the OpenAI Agents SDK in 5 DaysMCP in 7 Days: Wire Tools Into Any AgentAgent Skills in 7 Days: Turn Experience Into Reusable CapabilityContext Engineering in 5 DaysRAG in 14 Days: From Retrieval to Trustworthy AnswersBuild an AI Short-Drama Production Pipeline With Agents in 14 Days
Tag
All#ranking2#evaluation15#chunking6#cost6#embeddings5#agentic-rag4#architecture4#hybrid-search4#ingestion4#abstention3#data-quality3#access-control2
92 more tagsShow fewer tags
#citation-verification2#contextual-retrieval2#cost-tradeoff2#debugging2#failure-modes2#golden-set2#long-context2#multi-hop2#observability2#query-rewriting2#recall2#refusal2#retrospective2#system-design2#api-design1#bi-encoder1#bm251#caching1#citations1#content-hash1#context-assembly1#coreference1#cost-optimization1#cross-encoder1#dimensions1#embedding-migration1#engineering-judgement1#error-propagation1#evidence1#failure-analysis1#faithfulness1#fallback1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#fine-tuning1#graph-rag1#grounding1#hallucination1#hnsw1#hyde1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#intent-routing1#invalidation1#iterative-scan1#ivfflat1#latency1#latency-budget1#llm-as-judge1#metadata1#model-selection1#modularity1#multi-tenancy1#multi-turn1#normalisation1#ocr1#ordering1#overlap1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#prioritization1#production-readiness1#prompt-caching1#prompt-engineering1#prompting1#quantization1#query-transformation1#rag1#rag-basics1#rank-fusion1#reliability1#rerank1#retrieval1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retrieval-quality1#risk-assessment1#rollout1#scaling1#self-reflection1#similarity1#stakeholder-communication1#streaming1#thresholds1#tool-design1#trade-offs1#vector-database1#vector-index1#zero-downtime1
RAG in 14 Days: From Retrieval to Trustworthy Answers
D1 Why Retrieve at All: Hallucination, Knowledge Cutoffs, and the Cost of Long Context; a Minimal Keyword-Only RAG
In BM25, what problems do term-frequency saturation and document length normalisation each solve? What happens if you set both k1 and b to zero?BM25 里的词频饱和与文档长度归一化分别在解决什么问题?把 k1 和 b 都设成 0 会发生什么?
Common in ChinaCommon overseasIntermediate#bm25#ranking#information-retrievalHow to reason about it · think before answering
- This checks whether you have actually read the formula rather than merely called a library. The test is whether you can map k1 and b onto specific terms and name the failure each one prevents.
- Start with the two holes in raw term frequency: keyword stuffing lets one document dominate by repeating a word, and long documents win by accident because they contain more words overall.
- k1 closes the first hole. Term frequency appears in both numerator and denominator, so the ratio approaches a ceiling instead of growing linearly. Fifty mentions are more relevant than five, but not ten times more relevant. A smaller k1 saturates sooner.
- b closes the second. The normalisation factor is one minus b plus b times document length over average length: at b equal to zero length is ignored entirely, at one it is fully penalised, and 0.75 is the conventional compromise.
- Now the trap in the question: k1 equal to zero collapses the ratio to a constant, so one occurrence scores the same as a hundred and matching becomes boolean. b equal to zero removes length entirely. Set both to zero and BM25 degenerates into a plain sum of inverse document frequencies.
- Expected follow-up: can you drop the IDF term? No. Without it, ubiquitous words drown everything else, and it is precisely IDF that lets BM25 work without a stopword list.
分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 这题考的是你有没有真的读过公式,而不是有没有调过库。判据很明确:能不能把 k1 和 b 各自对应到公式里的哪一项,并说出去掉之后会被什么样的文档钻空子。
- 先说朴素词频的两个漏洞:一是重复刷词,一篇文章把关键词写五十遍就能霸榜;二是长文占便宜,文档越长越容易蒙中查询里的词。这两个漏洞正好对应两个修正。
- k1 管第一个漏洞。分子分母里都有词频 f,所以词频涨上去之后整个分式趋近一个上界而不是线性增长——写五十遍确实比写五遍相关,但绝不该相关十倍。k1 越小饱和越快。
- b 管第二个漏洞。归一化项是 1 减 b 加上 b 乘以本文长度除以平均长度,b 等于 0 时完全不看长度,b 等于 1 时完全按长度比例惩罚,0.75 是长期折中的默认值。
- 回到题干那个陷阱:k1 设成 0 会让分式退化成常数,词出现一次和一百次得分完全一样,等于只剩「有没有出现过」的布尔匹配;b 设成 0 则长度信息彻底消失。两个一起设成 0,BM25 就退化成对逆文档频率求和,跟词频再无关系。
- 可预期的追问:那逆文档频率去掉行不行?答案是不行,去掉之后「的」「我们」这类高频词会淹没一切——而且要顺带说明 BM25 因此天然不需要停用词表,这一句最能体现你读懂了公式。
Key points
- k1 controls saturation and prevents keyword stuffing: the score approaches a ceiling rather than growing linearly with frequency.
- b controls length normalisation and stops long documents from winning by sheer word count.
- Setting k1 to zero degenerates the scorer into boolean matching; one occurrence scores the same as a hundred.
- Setting b to zero removes document length from the equation entirely; both at zero leaves only a sum of IDF terms.
- IDF is the third component: it up-weights rare terms and removes the need for a stopword list.
答题要点
- 词频饱和由 k1 控制,防的是重复刷词:词频涨大后得分趋近上界而非线性增长。
- 长度归一化由 b 控制,防的是长文档靠词多蒙中查询,用本文长度比平均长度把它压回去。
- k1 设 0 会退化成布尔匹配,词出现一次和一百次同分;b 设 0 则完全不考虑文档长度。
- 两者都设 0 时 BM25 只剩逆文档频率求和,等于放弃了词频信息。
- 逆文档频率是第三块,让稀有词权重更高,也让 BM25 天然不需要停用词表。
D8 Evaluation First: Building a Golden Set, Computing Recall and Ranking Metrics, Using a Model as Judge for Faithfulness
Recall, mean reciprocal rank, and normalized discounted cumulative gain - which failure mode does each one catch first, and what do you miss by watching only one?召回率、平均倒数排名、归一化折损累计增益,这三个检索指标分别在什么故障下会先掉下来?只盯一个会漏掉什么?
Common in ChinaCommon overseasIntermediate#retrieval-metrics#evaluation#rankingHow to reason about it · think before answering
- This tests whether you know each metric's blind spot, not whether you can recite definitions. Layer them as 'did it show up / how high / how good overall' and you are halfway there.
- Recall is boolean: is the answer document in the final context. It catches 'never retrieved', but it does not move when the answer slips from rank 1 to rank 8, as long as it still fits the budget.
- MRR looks only at the rank of the first relevant hit, so ranking degradation shows up immediately. Its blind spot: one relevant item in the top ten scores exactly the same as five.
- nDCG discounts every relevant hit in the top k by its position, so it tracks overall ranking quality and is the direct optimization target for reranking. Its blind spot is existence - it is zero both when nothing was retrieved and when ranking is terrible.
- Conclusion: together they localize the failure. Recall drops means retrieval or chunking; recall flat but MRR down means ranking degraded, reach for a reranker; both stable but nDCG down means more noise crept into the top results.
- Expected follow-up: what if a metric saturates? Make the questions harder - a saturated metric means the eval set lost its discriminative power, and further tuning is blind.
分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 这题考的是「知不知道指标之间的盲区」,不是背定义。能把三者按「有没有 / 靠不靠前 / 整体好不好」分层的,基本就答对了一半。
- 推导链是这样的:召回率是布尔的——答案文档在不在最终上下文里。它对「压根没捞到」最敏感,但答案从第 1 名掉到第 8 名它一动不动,只要还在预算内。
- 倒数排名只看第一条相关结果的名次,所以「答案还在但被挤到后面」它立刻掉。反过来它有个盲区:前十条里有一条命中还是五条命中,它给的分完全一样。
- 归一化折损累计增益把前 k 名里每一条相关结果都按名次折算再累加,所以它对「整体排序质量」敏感,是重排最直接的优化目标。它的盲区是不告诉你「有没有」——召回率为零时它也是零,看不出是没捞到还是排得差。
- 结论:三个一起看才能定位故障层。召回率掉说明检索或切块出了问题,要动召回策略;召回率不动而倒数排名掉,说明排序退化,该上重排;两者都稳而 nDCG 掉,说明前几名里混进了更多噪声。
- 可预期的追问是「指标顶格了怎么办」。真实答案是把题目做难:指标撞天花板说明评估集失去区分度,这时候继续优化系统是在瞎调。
Key points
- Recall answers 'did it make it into the context', sensitive to total misses, blind to rank shifts.
- MRR answers 'how high is the first hit', sensitive to ranking degradation, blind to how many hits there are.
- nDCG answers 'how good is the top k overall', the direct target for reranking, blind to existence.
- Only the combination localizes the failure to retrieval, ranking, or noise.
- State the hit criterion: context is packed against a token budget, not a fixed top-k.
答题要点
- 召回率管「有没有进上下文」,对完全没捞到最敏感,对名次变化不敏感。
- 平均倒数排名管「第一条排第几」,对排序退化最敏感,但分不清命中一条还是五条。
- 归一化折损累计增益管「前 k 名整体质量」,是重排的直接优化目标,但看不出有没有。
- 三者组合才能定位故障在召回层、排序层还是噪声层。
- 命中口径要说清:按 token 预算装上下文,不是按固定条数取前 k。