Interview Bank
328 questions total; 1 shown with current filters.
CourseAllFrom Frontend Engineer to Agent Engineer in 30 DaysPrompt Engineering From Scratch in 5 DaysMastering Claude: From Conversation to Claude Code in 5 DaysMastering Codex and the OpenAI Agents SDK in 5 DaysMCP in 7 Days: Wire Tools Into Any AgentAgent Skills in 7 Days: Turn Experience Into Reusable CapabilityContext Engineering in 5 DaysRAG in 14 Days: From Retrieval to Trustworthy AnswersBuild an AI Short-Drama Production Pipeline With Agents in 14 Days
Tag
All#tools1#evaluation13#cost11#reliability11#agent-skills7#security6#idempotency5#streaming5#system-design5#prompt-injection4#architecture3#observability3
126 more tagsShow fewer tags
#agent-loop2#api-design2#chunking2#cost-tradeoff2#debugging2#distributed-systems2#error-handling2#hybrid-search2#llm-as-judge2#multi-agent2#multi-hop2#oauth2#operations2#pipeline-design2#prompt-caching2#rag2#recall2#retrospective2#retry2#scheduling2#sse2#tool-permissions2#trade-offs2#access-control1#agentic-rag1#agents-sdk1#analytics1#architecture-review1#behavioral1#budget-control1#caching1#cancellation1#checkpointing1#circuit-breaker1#citation-verification1#client1#client-integration1#coding-agent1#compaction1#compliance1#concurrency1#confused-deputy1#context-engineering1#contextual-retrieval1#copyright1#correctness1#cost-control1#customer-support1#data-quality1#database1#deployment1#distribution1#embedding-migration1#error-propagation1#escalation1#evidence1#faithfulness1#fallback1#feedback-loop1#fencing-token1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#framework-design1#graph-rag1#guardrails1#handoff1#image-generation1#integration1#iterative-scan1#json-parsing1#labeling1#latency1#latency-budget1#least-privilege1#long-context1#long-session1#long-term-memory1#mcp1#message-bus1#methodology1#model-migration1#multi-tenancy1#notifications1#ocr1#offline-testing1#project-storytelling1#protocol-versions1#quality1#query-rewriting1#rate-limiting1#reconnect1#refusal1#replay1#reproducibility1#rerank1#resume1#retrieval1#risk-assessment1#rollout1#routing1#runtime1#safety1#scaling1#self-introduction1#split-brain1#state-management1#state-persistence1#statelessness1#stdio-transport1#storytelling1#subagent1#subagents1#subscriptions1#test-strategy1#thresholds1#timezone1#token-accounting1#tool-design1#tool-schema1#trust-boundary1#ux1#verification1#versioning1#workflow-design1#workflow-engine1#zero-downtime1
From Frontend Engineer to Agent Engineer in 30 Days
D1 LLM API Basics: messages/roles, Tokens, Streaming, Temperature; What an Agent Actually Is
After a retry, how do you avoid double billing and re-executing tool calls that already ran?断线重试之后,怎么保证不重复计费、也不重复执行已经做过的工具调用?
Common in ChinaCommon overseasDeep dive#reliability#tools#idempotencyHow to reason about it · think before answering
- Split it in two: billing is a bookkeeping problem, tool side effects are an execution problem, and they have different fixes.
- Billing: meter server-side by tokens actually produced, not by request count. Tokens produced before the break are real cost; so are retry tokens. The point is not to count the same batch twice.
- That needs a stable identifier: give each generation a run id and dedupe usage records by run id plus sequence.
- Tools: the danger is side-effecting tools — transfers, messages, orders. The fix is an idempotency key derived from the call arguments, checked before execution.
- Add the state-machine view: record each call as pending / running / done and replay only what is unfinished.
- Follow-up: who generates the idempotency key? The caller must, and pass it along — a server-generated key cannot stay stable across retries.
分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 先把问题拆成两半:计费是「记录问题」,工具副作用是「执行问题」,两者的解法不同,混在一起答会含糊。
- 计费侧:用量应该在服务端按实际收到的 token 记账,而不是按「请求次数」。断在中途已经产生的 token 是真实成本,要照记;重试产生的是新成本,也要照记——关键是别把同一批 token 记两遍。
- 为此需要一个稳定的标识:给每轮生成一个 run id,用量记录以 run id + 序号去重,重放同一段不会重复入账。
- 工具侧:真正危险的是有副作用的工具(转账、发消息、下单)。解法是幂等键——由调用参数派生一个稳定的 key,执行前先查这个 key 是否已有结果,有就直接返回旧结果。
- 补一层状态机视角:把每次工具调用记为「待执行 / 执行中 / 已完成」,重试时只重放未完成的部分,已完成的直接取结果,这也是恢复中断任务的通用做法。
- 常见追问:幂等键该谁生成?应由客户端或调度侧生成并随请求传递,服务端自己生成就没法跨重试保持一致。
Key points
- Separate billing (bookkeeping) from tool side effects (execution); they need different mechanisms
- Meter by tokens actually produced, deduped by run id plus sequence so one batch is never counted twice
- Guard side-effecting tools with an idempotency key derived from the call arguments
- Model each tool call as pending / running / done and replay only unfinished work
- The caller must generate and pass the idempotency key so it stays stable across retries
答题要点
- 拆成两个问题:计费是记账问题,工具副作用是执行问题,解法不同
- 计费按服务端实际产生的 token 记,用 run id 加序号去重,避免同一批 token 重复入账
- 有副作用的工具用幂等键:由调用参数派生稳定 key,执行前先查是否已有结果
- 把每次工具调用记成待执行/执行中/已完成的状态机,重试只重放未完成的部分
- 幂等键要由调用方生成并随请求传递,服务端自行生成无法跨重试保持一致