Interview Bank
328 questions total; 1 shown with current filters.
CourseAllFrom Frontend Engineer to Agent Engineer in 30 DaysPrompt Engineering From Scratch in 5 DaysMastering Claude: From Conversation to Claude Code in 5 DaysMastering Codex and the OpenAI Agents SDK in 5 DaysMCP in 7 Days: Wire Tools Into Any AgentAgent Skills in 7 Days: Turn Experience Into Reusable CapabilityContext Engineering in 5 DaysRAG in 14 Days: From Retrieval to Trustworthy AnswersBuild an AI Short-Drama Production Pipeline With Agents in 14 Days
Tag
All#degradation1#evaluation30#cost29#reliability24#architecture22#agent-skills21#security18#observability15#streaming12#error-handling11#idempotency10#system-design10
359 more tagsShow fewer tags
#api-design9#coding-agent9#distributed-systems8#multi-agent8#rag8#chunking7#debugging7#pipeline-design7#structured-output7#agent-loop6#mcp6#operations6#prompt-injection6#sse6#tool-calling6#tool-design6#context5#context-engineering5#deployment5#embeddings5#hybrid-search5#message-bus5#scheduling5#system-prompt5#agentic-rag4#behavioral4#client4#concurrency4#consistency4#framework-design4#ingestion4#prompt-engineering4#rate-limiting4#retrieval4#routing4#trade-offs4#abstention3#agents-sdk3#caching3#communication3#context-window3#cost-control3#data-quality3#failure-modes3#image-generation3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#latency3#llm-as-judge3#llm-basics3#long-context3#model-migration3#model-routing3#orchestration3#ordering3#progressive-disclosure3#prompt-basics3#prompt-caching3#protocol3#provider-abstraction3#ranking3#recall3#redis-streams3#responses-api3#resume3#retry3#runtime3#scalability3#skills3#state-management3#statelessness3#subagents3#timeline3#versioning3#workflow-engine3#access-control2#agent-design2#async-task2#auth2#checkpointing2#citation-verification2#citations2#claude-md2#code-review2#compaction2#context-rot2#contextual-retrieval2#cost-tradeoff2#data-modeling2#database2#distribution2#fallback2#ffmpeg2#golden-set2#grounding2#interview-process2#long-term-memory2#media-pipeline2#memory2#multi-hop2#multi-tenancy2#oauth2#prioritization2#project-storytelling2#prompt-techniques2#query-rewriting2#react2#refusal2#reproducibility2#rerank2#retrieval-quality2#retrospective2#scripts2#sharding2#state-machine2#tool-permissions2#tooling2#tools2#tracing2#transport2#tts2#ux2#vector-database2#verification2#workflow2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#agent-sdk1#agents-md1#altitude1#analytics1#approvals1#architecture-review1#async1#atomicity1#attention-budget1#av-sync1#backoff1#bi-encoder1#bm251#budget-control1#build-vs-buy1#cancellation1#candidate-selection1#capacity-planning1#career1#chain-of-thought1#ci1#circuit-breaker1#claude-code1#cli-design1#client-integration1#cloud1#compression1#configuration1#confused-deputy1#consistent-hashing1#content-hash1#content-safety1#context-assembly1#context-compression1#context-management1#coreference1#correctness1#cost-accounting1#cost-analysis1#cost-optimization1#cross-encoder1#cross-model1#customer-support1#dag1#decision-making1#decomposition1#deliberate-practice1#design1#diagnostics1#dimensions1#docker1#documentation1#embedding-migration1#encoding1#engineering-judgement1#engineering-tradeoffs1#error-propagation1#escalation1#eval1#event-driven1#evidence1#failure-analysis1#fairness1#faithfulness1#fan-out1#feedback-loop1#fencing-token1#few-shot1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#fine-tuning1#forking1#four-elements1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#graph-rag1#guardrails1#hallucination1#handoff1#handoffs1#headless1#hnsw1#hooks1#human-in-the-loop1#hybrid1#hyde1#incremental-recompute1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#instruction-hierarchy1#integration1#intent-routing1#interrupt-merge1#invalidation1#isolation1#iterative-scan1#ivfflat1#json-parsing1#json-schema1#just-in-time1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#latency-budget1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-output-quality1#long-session1#loop-guard1#maintenance1#mcp-basics1#mental-model1#messages-api1#metadata1#methodology1#metrics1#migration1#mobile1#model-selection1#moderation1#modularity1#multi-turn1#multimodal1#nodejs1#normalisation1#notifications1#ocr1#offline-testing1#openai1#overlap1#pagination1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#performance1#permissions1#persistence1#pgvector1#pipeline-reliability1#portfolio1#primitives1#priority-queue1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#production-readiness1#prompt1#prompt-assembly1#prompt-bloat1#prompt-design1#prompt-limits1#prompt-surface1#prompt-template1#prompt-versioning1#prompting1#protocol-versions1#quality1#quality-check1#quantization1#query-transformation1#quiet-hours1#rag-basics1#rank-fusion1#reasoning1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retry-semantics1#retry-strategy1#review1#risk-assessment1#rollback1#rollout1#rrf1#safety1#sampling1#sandbox1#sandboxing1#scaling1#schema-design1#schema-validation1#scoping1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#self-reflection1#server-design1#service-architecture1#session-management1#sessions1#similarity1#skill-authoring1#skill-description1#skill-design1#spec1#split-brain1#stakeholder-communication1#star1#state-persistence1#stateless1#stdio-transport1#stopping-criteria1#storytelling1#subagent1#subscriptions1#subtitles1#task-graph1#team-governance1#test-set1#test-strategy1#testing1#thresholds1#timezone1#token-accounting1#token-budget1#tool-budget1#tool-execution1#tool-naming1#tool-schema1#trust-boundary1#tuning1#validation1#vector-index1#workflow-design1#xml-tags1#zero-downtime1
Build an AI Short-Drama Production Pipeline With Agents in 14 Days
D12 Cost and Model Routing: Choosing a Model per Stage, Caching, Degradation, and a Budget Circuit Breaker
When should you degrade instead of retry, and which dimensions can you degrade first?什么情况下该降级而不是重试?如果决定降级,你有哪些维度可以降,怎么排先后?
Common in ChinaCommon overseasIntermediate#degradation#retry-strategyHow to reason about it · think before answering
- The pivot is the word instead. This tests whether you separate two failure classes: retry addresses bad luck this time, degradation addresses cannot finish under this configuration. Answering retry three times then degrade misses the point.
- Give a reusable rule: retry fixes transient, configuration-independent problems such as rate limits, timeouts and server errors. Degradation fixes persistent, constraint-driven ones such as running out of budget, quota or time. Retrying the second class just burns resources faster.
- Name the class most people get wrong: a content-safety block should be neither retried nor degraded, it needs a changed input. Conflating the three is the biggest scoring mistake here.
- Order degradation dimensions by how noticeable they are, least to most: resolution, duration, then count of items. Touch the one that changes the content itself only as a last resort.
- Add an engineering rule: validate every degradation step against the cost model. If a step saves nothing on your rate card, degrading quality buys you nothing and should be skipped.
- Expect the follow-up: when do you decide? Project the cost with a pure function before the run starts and degrade up front. Cutting mid-run leaves a half-finished artifact and wastes everything already spent.
分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 题眼在「而不是」三个字。它考的是你能不能区分两类失败:重试针对的是「这次不巧」,降级针对的是「按当前配置根本跑不完」。答成「先重试三次再降级」就落进了套路。
- 给一条可复用的判据:重试解决的是**瞬时**且**与配置无关**的问题(限流、超时、服务端 5xx),降级解决的是**持续**且**由约束导致**的问题(预算不够、配额见底、截止时间快到了)。前者重试有效,后者重试只会把资源烧得更快。
- 顺带点出最容易被答错的一类:内容安全拦截既不该重试也不该降级,它要改输入。把三类混在一起是这题最大的失分点。
- 降级的维度要按「用户察觉难度」排,从低到高:清晰度、时长、数量(镜头数 / 条数)。先降察觉不到的,最后才动会影响内容本身的那一档。
- 还有一条工程判据:每一步降级都要拿成本模型验证一遍。如果某一档在你的单价表上省不出钱(比如更低的清晰度和当前档同价),那这一步降了只有损失,应该直接跳过。
- 可预期的追问是「降级要在什么时候决定」。答案是开跑之前先用纯函数预估一遍,算不过就降完再跑——跑到一半再砍,会留下半成品,前面花的钱全打水漂。
Key points
- Retry transient configuration-independent failures; degrade when the constraint makes completion impossible
- Content-safety blocks are a third class: change the input rather than retrying or degrading
- Order degradation by noticeability: resolution, duration, item count, content last
- Validate each degradation step against the rate card and skip steps that save nothing
- Decide before the run starts; cutting mid-run leaves a half-finished artifact and wastes prior spend
答题要点
- 重试针对瞬时且与配置无关的失败,降级针对持续且由约束导致的不可完成
- 内容安全拦截是第三类:既不重试也不降级,要改输入
- 降级维度按察觉难度排:清晰度、时长、数量,最后才动内容本身
- 每一步降级都要拿成本模型验证,省不出钱的那一步直接跳过
- 降级要在开跑前决定,跑到一半再砍会留下半成品且前面的钱白花