Dayward AI

Interview Bank

328 questions total; 1 shown with current filters.

Tag
359 more tags
#api-design9#coding-agent9#distributed-systems8#multi-agent8#rag8#chunking7#debugging7#pipeline-design7#structured-output7#agent-loop6#mcp6#operations6#prompt-injection6#sse6#tool-calling6#tool-design6#context5#context-engineering5#deployment5#embeddings5#hybrid-search5#message-bus5#scheduling5#system-prompt5#agentic-rag4#behavioral4#client4#concurrency4#consistency4#framework-design4#ingestion4#prompt-engineering4#rate-limiting4#retrieval4#routing4#trade-offs4#abstention3#agents-sdk3#caching3#communication3#context-window3#cost-control3#data-quality3#failure-modes3#image-generation3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#latency3#llm-as-judge3#llm-basics3#long-context3#model-migration3#model-routing3#orchestration3#ordering3#progressive-disclosure3#prompt-basics3#prompt-caching3#protocol3#provider-abstraction3#ranking3#recall3#redis-streams3#responses-api3#resume3#retry3#runtime3#scalability3#skills3#state-management3#statelessness3#subagents3#timeline3#versioning3#workflow-engine3#access-control2#agent-design2#async-task2#auth2#checkpointing2#citation-verification2#citations2#claude-md2#code-review2#compaction2#context-rot2#contextual-retrieval2#cost-tradeoff2#data-modeling2#database2#distribution2#fallback2#ffmpeg2#golden-set2#grounding2#interview-process2#long-term-memory2#media-pipeline2#memory2#multi-hop2#multi-tenancy2#oauth2#prioritization2#project-storytelling2#prompt-techniques2#query-rewriting2#react2#refusal2#reproducibility2#rerank2#retrieval-quality2#retrospective2#scripts2#sharding2#state-machine2#tool-permissions2#tooling2#tools2#tracing2#transport2#tts2#ux2#vector-database2#verification2#workflow2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#agent-sdk1#agents-md1#altitude1#analytics1#approvals1#architecture-review1#async1#atomicity1#attention-budget1#av-sync1#backoff1#bi-encoder1#bm251#budget-control1#build-vs-buy1#cancellation1#candidate-selection1#capacity-planning1#career1#chain-of-thought1#ci1#circuit-breaker1#claude-code1#cli-design1#client-integration1#cloud1#compression1#configuration1#confused-deputy1#consistent-hashing1#content-hash1#content-safety1#context-assembly1#context-compression1#context-management1#coreference1#correctness1#cost-accounting1#cost-analysis1#cost-optimization1#cross-encoder1#cross-model1#customer-support1#dag1#decision-making1#decomposition1#degradation1#deliberate-practice1#design1#diagnostics1#dimensions1#docker1#documentation1#embedding-migration1#encoding1#engineering-judgement1#engineering-tradeoffs1#error-propagation1#escalation1#eval1#event-driven1#evidence1#failure-analysis1#fairness1#faithfulness1#fan-out1#feedback-loop1#fencing-token1#few-shot1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#fine-tuning1#forking1#four-elements1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#graph-rag1#guardrails1#hallucination1#handoff1#handoffs1#headless1#hnsw1#hooks1#human-in-the-loop1#hybrid1#hyde1#incremental-recompute1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#instruction-hierarchy1#integration1#intent-routing1#interrupt-merge1#invalidation1#isolation1#iterative-scan1#ivfflat1#json-parsing1#json-schema1#just-in-time1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#latency-budget1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-output-quality1#long-session1#loop-guard1#maintenance1#mcp-basics1#mental-model1#messages-api1#metadata1#methodology1#metrics1#migration1#mobile1#model-selection1#moderation1#modularity1#multi-turn1#multimodal1#nodejs1#normalisation1#notifications1#ocr1#offline-testing1#openai1#overlap1#pagination1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#performance1#permissions1#persistence1#pgvector1#pipeline-reliability1#portfolio1#primitives1#priority-queue1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#production-readiness1#prompt1#prompt-assembly1#prompt-bloat1#prompt-design1#prompt-limits1#prompt-surface1#prompt-template1#prompt-versioning1#prompting1#protocol-versions1#quality1#quality-check1#quantization1#query-transformation1#quiet-hours1#rag-basics1#rank-fusion1#reasoning1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retry-semantics1#retry-strategy1#review1#risk-assessment1#rollback1#rollout1#rrf1#safety1#sampling1#sandbox1#sandboxing1#scaling1#schema-design1#schema-validation1#scoping1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#self-reflection1#server-design1#service-architecture1#session-management1#sessions1#similarity1#skill-authoring1#skill-description1#skill-design1#split-brain1#stakeholder-communication1#star1#state-persistence1#stateless1#stdio-transport1#stopping-criteria1#storytelling1#subagent1#subscriptions1#subtitles1#task-graph1#team-governance1#test-set1#test-strategy1#testing1#thresholds1#timezone1#token-accounting1#token-budget1#tool-budget1#tool-execution1#tool-naming1#tool-schema1#trust-boundary1#tuning1#validation1#vector-index1#workflow-design1#xml-tags1#zero-downtime1

Agent Skills in 7 Days: Turn Experience Into Reusable Capability

D1 What Skills Are: the SKILL.md Spec, Directory Layout, and Three-Stage Progressive Disclosure

  • What hard constraints does the spec put on the name and description fields, and why is name so tightly constrained?SKILL.md 的 name 与 description 有哪些硬性约束?规范为什么要把 name 卡得这么死?
    Common in ChinaCommon overseasIntermediate#agent-skills#spec

    How to reason about it · think before answering

    1. It looks like spec recall, but the real question is the why. Listing the constraints is a pass; explaining which engineering problem they prevent is the differentiator.
    2. Name has five constraints: one to sixty-four characters, lowercase letters digits and hyphens only, no leading or trailing hyphen, no consecutive hyphens, and it must match the parent directory name.
    3. Description has two: one to one thousand twenty-four characters, and it must convey both what the skill does and when to use it.
    4. The reason name is strict: it is the skill's identity across the ecosystem, feeding directory lookup, namespacing, slash-command invocation and collision precedence. One casing mismatch becomes an installed but uncallable skill.
    5. Mention the real-world wrinkle: many clients deliberately relax the name-matches-directory rule and only warn, so a skill can work locally and vanish under a stricter implementation.
    6. Expected follow-up: what if the description runs to a thousand characters? You pay for it every session. Twenty maxed-out descriptions cost eight thousand tokens of catalog, so shorten the text rather than dropping skills.

    分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答

    1. 这题看着像背规范,其实题眼在后半句「为什么」。能把约束背全只算及格,能说出这些约束是为了解决什么工程问题才是加分项。
    2. 先把 name 的五条约束数完:长度一到六十四个字符、只能用小写字母数字和连字符、不能以连字符开头或结尾、不能有连续两个连字符、必须与父目录名一致。
    3. 再给 description 的两条:长度一到一千零二十四个字符;内容上要同时说清做什么和什么时候用,而不是只说做什么。
    4. 解释「为什么卡这么死」:name 是这个 skill 在整个生态里的唯一标识,要拼进目录名、命名空间、斜杠命令,还要在两个 skill 撞名时用来判优先级。任何一处大小写或分隔符不一致,都会变成一个很难查的「装了却调不到」。
    5. 补一个真实的坑:很多客户端在实现时故意放宽了「name 等于目录名」这条,不一致只打警告仍然加载。于是你本地一切正常,换个严格实现就整个消失。
    6. 可预期的追问是「description 写到一千个字符会怎样」。答案是它每次会话都要付一遍,二十个 skill 都写满上限,光目录就要八千 token,这时候该做的是把描述写短而不是删 skill。

    Key points

    • Name: one to sixty-four characters, lowercase alphanumerics and hyphens, no leading or trailing hyphen, no double hyphens, must equal the directory name.
    • Description: one to one thousand twenty-four characters, stating both what it does and when to use it.
    • Name is strict because it is the skill's identity for lookup, namespacing, invocation and collision precedence.
    • Many clients validate name leniently, so working locally does not guarantee working elsewhere.
    • The description is a fixed per-session cost, so keep it as short as it can be while still triggering.

    答题要点

    • name:一到六十四字符、小写字母数字与连字符、首尾不能是连字符、不能有连续连字符、必须等于父目录名。
    • description:一到一千零二十四字符,必须同时说清做什么与什么时候用。
    • name 卡死是因为它是唯一标识,要参与目录查找、命名空间、命令调用与撞名优先级。
    • 很多客户端对 name 做宽松校验,本地能跑不代表换个客户端也能跑。
    • description 是每次会话都要付的固定开销,能短则短。