逐日AI

面试题库

共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。

标签
还有 136 个标签
#api-design6#operations6#sse6#deployment5#message-bus5#tool-calling5#agent-loop4#behavioral4#error-handling4#evaluation4#framework-design4#mcp4#routing4#concurrency3#context-engineering3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#llm-basics3#model-routing3#orchestration3#prompt-injection3#protocol3#redis-streams3#scalability3#scheduling3#agent-design2#auth2#checkpointing2#communication2#cost-control2#database2#debugging2#interview-process2#latency2#long-term-memory2#memory2#ordering2#prompt-engineering2#rate-limiting2#react2#resume2#retrieval2#sharding2#state-machine2#state-management2#tool-design2#tool-permissions2#trade-offs2#ux2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#async1#atomicity1#cancellation1#capacity-planning1#career1#chunking1#compression1#configuration1#consistent-hashing1#context1#context-compression1#context-management1#correctness1#customer-support1#deliberate-practice1#docker1#documentation1#engineering-tradeoffs1#escalation1#event-driven1#fallback1#fan-out1#fencing-token1#forking1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#hybrid-search1#interrupt-merge1#isolation1#json-parsing1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-as-judge1#loop-guard1#mobile1#multi-tenancy1#nodejs1#performance1#persistence1#pgvector1#portfolio1#prioritization1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#project-storytelling1#prompt1#provider-abstraction1#quiet-hours1#ranking1#recall1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#rerank1#retrieval-quality1#retry1#retry-semantics1#rrf1#sampling1#sandboxing1#schema-design1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#service-architecture1#session-management1#split-brain1#star1#stateless1#storytelling1#structured-output1#system-prompt1#testing1#timezone1#tool-execution1#tools1#tracing1#transport1#vector-database1

30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师

D13 cron 调度(中心调度→stream 投递)+ 成本计量(token→USD 台账、usage report)

  • 让你从零设计一套 token 成本计量和台账系统,你会怎么做?How would you design a token cost metering and ledger system from scratch?
    国内高频海外高频进阶#cost#observability#data-modeling

    分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答

    1. 这题在考「你有没有真的对过账」。区分度在两个地方:金额用什么类型存,以及金额是冗余存还是查询时现算。答不到这两点的方案,上线三个月就会被财务打回来。
    2. 先立判据:台账不是日志。日志是给排查问题用的,删了就删了;台账要拿去对账、要回答「这个月为什么涨了 40%」,所以每一笔钱都必须能追回到「谁、因为哪一次执行、用哪个模型、花了多少 token」。字段设计全部由这条判据推出来。
    3. 然后给字段和理由,一一对应:user_id 回答该算谁头上、run_id 回答属于哪次执行(允许为空,因为有系统级批量开销)、model 存调用当时那一个(fallback 会让同一段业务落到不同模型上)、kind 区分 chat 和 embedding(两者量级和增长曲线完全不同)、prompt_tokens 与 completion_tokens 分开存(输入输出单价差三到四倍,只存 total 就算不回金额,也看不出是提示词太长还是模型太啰嗦)。
    4. 接着是两个最能体现经验的判断。第一,金额用定点类型:数据库用 numeric,代码里用 Decimal 或 BigDecimal,绝不用双精度浮点累加,否则十万条之后总额和逐条相加对不上。第二,cost_usd 要在写入那一刻算好并冗余存,不要查询时用当前价格表现算——价格会变,历史账单不能跟着一起变,这是台账和报表最本质的区别。
    5. 还要主动说记账的时机和事务边界:记账放在「拿到 usage 字段」那一刻,而不是「业务成功」那一刻,因为失败的调用同样产生费用,尤其 fallback 会一次业务跨两三次收费调用。台账写入不必和业务同事务(丢一条只是几厘钱,锁住台账表却会卡住用户对话),可以异步加重试,用 run_id 加调用序号做唯一约束防重;但如果产品有额度限制,配额扣减必须同事务,否则用户能靠并发把额度刷穿。
    6. 可以预期的追问:厂商调价了历史数据怎么办?答案是价格表本身要有生效时间和版本号,台账里既存算好的金额也可以存价格版本,这样重算和审计都有依据。

    How to reason about it · think before answering

    1. This question tests whether you have ever reconciled a bill. The discriminators are the numeric type you store money in, and whether cost is stored or computed at query time. A design missing either gets rejected by finance within a quarter.
    2. Set the criterion first: a ledger is not a log. Logs exist for debugging and can be dropped; a ledger has to reconcile against the vendor invoice and answer why the bill grew 40% this month, so every charge must trace back to who, which run, which model, and how many tokens. Every field falls out of that.
    3. Then walk the fields with reasons: user_id says whose budget it hits; run_id says which execution it belongs to and is nullable because some spend is system-level batch work; model records the one actually used, since fallback routes the same workload to different providers; kind separates chat from embedding because their volumes and growth curves differ completely; prompt_tokens and completion_tokens are stored separately because input and output differ three- to four-fold in price, and a single total can neither reproduce the amount nor tell you whether the prompt is bloated or the model is verbose.
    4. Now the two judgments that show experience. First, money uses fixed-point: numeric in the database, Decimal or BigDecimal in code, never accumulated in binary floats, or the total will diverge from the sum of rows after a hundred thousand entries. Second, cost is computed at write time and stored redundantly, not recomputed from the current price table — prices change, and history must not change with them. That is the essential difference between a ledger and a report.
    5. Volunteer the timing and transaction boundary: record at the moment you receive the usage field, not at business success, because failed calls still cost money and a fallback spans two or three billable calls per business operation. Ledger writes need not share the business transaction — losing a row costs fractions of a cent, while locking the ledger table stalls user conversations — so write asynchronously with retries and a uniqueness constraint on run id plus call index. The exception is quota enforcement: if the product caps spend, the decrement must be transactional or concurrent requests will blow through the cap.
    6. Expect: what happens to history when the vendor changes prices? The price table itself needs effective dates and a version, and the ledger stores both the computed amount and the price version, so recomputation and audit both have a basis.

    答题要点

    • 台账不是日志:每一笔钱要能追回到谁、哪一次 run、哪个模型、多少 token,字段设计全由这条判据推出
    • prompt_tokens 与 completion_tokens 必须分开存,因为输入输出单价差三到四倍,只存 total 既算不回金额也看不出问题出在哪一侧
    • 金额用定点类型(数据库 numeric、代码 Decimal/BigDecimal),不要用浮点累加,否则总额和逐条相加对不上
    • cost_usd 在写入那一刻算好并冗余存,不要查询时按当前价格现算——价格会变,历史账单不能跟着变
    • 记账时机是拿到 usage 字段那一刻而不是业务成功那一刻,失败调用和 fallback 同样产生费用;台账可异步写入加重试,但配额扣减必须和业务同事务

    Key points

    • A ledger is not a log: every charge must trace to a user, a run, a model and a token count, and the schema follows from that
    • Store prompt and completion tokens separately, since input and output prices differ three- to four-fold and a single total can neither reproduce the amount nor localize the problem
    • Use fixed-point money (numeric in the database, Decimal or BigDecimal in code); float accumulation makes totals disagree with the sum of rows
    • Compute cost at write time and store it, rather than recomputing from today's price table, so history stays stable when prices change
    • Record at the moment usage is returned, not at business success — failed calls and fallbacks still cost money; ledger writes can be async with retries, but quota decrements must be transactional