面试题库
共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。
课程全部30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师5 天提示词工程零基础Claude 高效使用:从对话到 Claude CodeCodex 与 OpenAI Agents SDK 高效使用7 天 MCP:把工具接进任何 Agent7 天 Agent Skills:把经验做成可复用能力5 天上下文工程14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答14 天用 Agent 搭一条 AI 短剧生产线
标签
全部#data-modeling1#reliability22#cost15#architecture12#streaming11#security10#observability9#distributed-systems8#idempotency8#multi-agent8#rag7#system-design7
还有 136 个标签收起标签
#api-design6#operations6#sse6#deployment5#message-bus5#tool-calling5#agent-loop4#behavioral4#error-handling4#evaluation4#framework-design4#mcp4#routing4#concurrency3#context-engineering3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#llm-basics3#model-routing3#orchestration3#prompt-injection3#protocol3#redis-streams3#scalability3#scheduling3#agent-design2#auth2#checkpointing2#communication2#cost-control2#database2#debugging2#interview-process2#latency2#long-term-memory2#memory2#ordering2#prompt-engineering2#rate-limiting2#react2#resume2#retrieval2#sharding2#state-machine2#state-management2#tool-design2#tool-permissions2#trade-offs2#ux2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#async1#atomicity1#cancellation1#capacity-planning1#career1#chunking1#compression1#configuration1#consistent-hashing1#context1#context-compression1#context-management1#correctness1#customer-support1#deliberate-practice1#docker1#documentation1#engineering-tradeoffs1#escalation1#event-driven1#fallback1#fan-out1#fencing-token1#forking1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#hybrid-search1#interrupt-merge1#isolation1#json-parsing1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-as-judge1#loop-guard1#mobile1#multi-tenancy1#nodejs1#performance1#persistence1#pgvector1#portfolio1#prioritization1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#project-storytelling1#prompt1#provider-abstraction1#quiet-hours1#ranking1#recall1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#rerank1#retrieval-quality1#retry1#retry-semantics1#rrf1#sampling1#sandboxing1#schema-design1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#service-architecture1#session-management1#split-brain1#star1#stateless1#storytelling1#structured-output1#system-prompt1#testing1#timezone1#tool-execution1#tools1#tracing1#transport1#vector-database1
30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师
D13 cron 调度(中心调度→stream 投递)+ 成本计量(token→USD 台账、usage report)
让你从零设计一套 token 成本计量和台账系统,你会怎么做?How would you design a token cost metering and ledger system from scratch?
国内高频海外高频进阶#cost#observability#data-modeling分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 这题在考「你有没有真的对过账」。区分度在两个地方:金额用什么类型存,以及金额是冗余存还是查询时现算。答不到这两点的方案,上线三个月就会被财务打回来。
- 先立判据:台账不是日志。日志是给排查问题用的,删了就删了;台账要拿去对账、要回答「这个月为什么涨了 40%」,所以每一笔钱都必须能追回到「谁、因为哪一次执行、用哪个模型、花了多少 token」。字段设计全部由这条判据推出来。
- 然后给字段和理由,一一对应:user_id 回答该算谁头上、run_id 回答属于哪次执行(允许为空,因为有系统级批量开销)、model 存调用当时那一个(fallback 会让同一段业务落到不同模型上)、kind 区分 chat 和 embedding(两者量级和增长曲线完全不同)、prompt_tokens 与 completion_tokens 分开存(输入输出单价差三到四倍,只存 total 就算不回金额,也看不出是提示词太长还是模型太啰嗦)。
- 接着是两个最能体现经验的判断。第一,金额用定点类型:数据库用 numeric,代码里用 Decimal 或 BigDecimal,绝不用双精度浮点累加,否则十万条之后总额和逐条相加对不上。第二,cost_usd 要在写入那一刻算好并冗余存,不要查询时用当前价格表现算——价格会变,历史账单不能跟着一起变,这是台账和报表最本质的区别。
- 还要主动说记账的时机和事务边界:记账放在「拿到 usage 字段」那一刻,而不是「业务成功」那一刻,因为失败的调用同样产生费用,尤其 fallback 会一次业务跨两三次收费调用。台账写入不必和业务同事务(丢一条只是几厘钱,锁住台账表却会卡住用户对话),可以异步加重试,用 run_id 加调用序号做唯一约束防重;但如果产品有额度限制,配额扣减必须同事务,否则用户能靠并发把额度刷穿。
- 可以预期的追问:厂商调价了历史数据怎么办?答案是价格表本身要有生效时间和版本号,台账里既存算好的金额也可以存价格版本,这样重算和审计都有依据。
How to reason about it · think before answering
- This question tests whether you have ever reconciled a bill. The discriminators are the numeric type you store money in, and whether cost is stored or computed at query time. A design missing either gets rejected by finance within a quarter.
- Set the criterion first: a ledger is not a log. Logs exist for debugging and can be dropped; a ledger has to reconcile against the vendor invoice and answer why the bill grew 40% this month, so every charge must trace back to who, which run, which model, and how many tokens. Every field falls out of that.
- Then walk the fields with reasons: user_id says whose budget it hits; run_id says which execution it belongs to and is nullable because some spend is system-level batch work; model records the one actually used, since fallback routes the same workload to different providers; kind separates chat from embedding because their volumes and growth curves differ completely; prompt_tokens and completion_tokens are stored separately because input and output differ three- to four-fold in price, and a single total can neither reproduce the amount nor tell you whether the prompt is bloated or the model is verbose.
- Now the two judgments that show experience. First, money uses fixed-point: numeric in the database, Decimal or BigDecimal in code, never accumulated in binary floats, or the total will diverge from the sum of rows after a hundred thousand entries. Second, cost is computed at write time and stored redundantly, not recomputed from the current price table — prices change, and history must not change with them. That is the essential difference between a ledger and a report.
- Volunteer the timing and transaction boundary: record at the moment you receive the usage field, not at business success, because failed calls still cost money and a fallback spans two or three billable calls per business operation. Ledger writes need not share the business transaction — losing a row costs fractions of a cent, while locking the ledger table stalls user conversations — so write asynchronously with retries and a uniqueness constraint on run id plus call index. The exception is quota enforcement: if the product caps spend, the decrement must be transactional or concurrent requests will blow through the cap.
- Expect: what happens to history when the vendor changes prices? The price table itself needs effective dates and a version, and the ledger stores both the computed amount and the price version, so recomputation and audit both have a basis.
答题要点
- 台账不是日志:每一笔钱要能追回到谁、哪一次 run、哪个模型、多少 token,字段设计全由这条判据推出
- prompt_tokens 与 completion_tokens 必须分开存,因为输入输出单价差三到四倍,只存 total 既算不回金额也看不出问题出在哪一侧
- 金额用定点类型(数据库 numeric、代码 Decimal/BigDecimal),不要用浮点累加,否则总额和逐条相加对不上
- cost_usd 在写入那一刻算好并冗余存,不要查询时按当前价格现算——价格会变,历史账单不能跟着变
- 记账时机是拿到 usage 字段那一刻而不是业务成功那一刻,失败调用和 fallback 同样产生费用;台账可异步写入加重试,但配额扣减必须和业务同事务
Key points
- A ledger is not a log: every charge must trace to a user, a run, a model and a token count, and the schema follows from that
- Store prompt and completion tokens separately, since input and output prices differ three- to four-fold and a single total can neither reproduce the amount nor localize the problem
- Use fixed-point money (numeric in the database, Decimal or BigDecimal in code); float accumulation makes totals disagree with the sum of rows
- Compute cost at write time and store it, rather than recomputing from today's price table, so history stays stable when prices change
- Record at the moment usage is returned, not at business success — failed calls and fallbacks still cost money; ledger writes can be async with retries, but quota decrements must be transactional