面试题库
共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。
课程全部30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师5 天提示词工程零基础Claude 高效使用:从对话到 Claude CodeCodex 与 OpenAI Agents SDK 高效使用7 天 MCP:把工具接进任何 Agent7 天 Agent Skills:把经验做成可复用能力5 天上下文工程14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答14 天用 Agent 搭一条 AI 短剧生产线
5 天提示词工程零基础
D1 提示词是什么、不是什么:模型如何读指令;角色 / 任务 / 格式 / 约束四要素
角色、任务、格式、约束四要素各解决什么问题?如果只能保留三个,你会砍掉哪个,为什么?What problem does each of the four prompt elements — role, task, format, constraints — solve? If you could keep only three, which would you drop and why?
国内高频海外高频进阶#prompt-basics#four-elements分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 前半句是送分,后半句才有区分度:它在考你是否知道每个要素对应模型的哪一种「猜」,以及哪种猜错的代价最小。
- 拆法:把每个要素映射到一个「模型会猜错的地方」——角色对应视角与关注点,任务对应终点在哪,格式对应输出能否被程序消费,约束对应改动范围与不可碰的边界。
- 判断哪个可砍:看缺了之后是「结果不稳定」还是「结果不可用」。缺角色多半是关注点偏了但仍可用;缺任务的完成标准会让模型不知何时停;缺格式会让下游解析失败;缺约束会让改动面失控。
- 结论:多数工程场景下角色最可砍,因为任务与格式写得足够具体时视角已经被隐含;但要说明前提是任务里已经写清了关注点。
- 追问几乎必然是「那为什么大家还都写角色」——答案是它便宜且能一句话压缩大量隐性偏好,在任务没法写得很细的对话场景里性价比最高。
How to reason about it · think before answering
- The first half is a warm-up; the second half tests whether you can map each element to a specific way the model would otherwise guess, and rank the cost of each wrong guess.
- Map them: role fixes perspective and focus, task fixes the finish line, format decides whether downstream code can consume the output, constraints bound the change surface.
- To pick the one to drop, ask whether its absence makes results unstable or unusable. Missing role skews focus but stays usable; missing done-criteria means the model never knows when to stop; missing format breaks parsers; missing constraints lets edits sprawl.
- Conclusion: in most engineering settings role is the most droppable, because a specific task plus a strict format already imply the perspective — provided the task states what to care about.
- Expect the follow-up 'then why does everyone write a role?' Because it is cheap and compresses many implicit preferences into one line, which pays off in chat-style use where the task cannot be fully specified.
答题要点
- 角色定视角与关注点;任务定做什么与完成标准;格式定输出形状是否可机械核对;约束定不可碰的边界与理由
- 每个要素对应模型的一种「猜」,缺哪个就多一种不稳定
- 可砍的是角色:任务与格式足够具体时视角已隐含,但前提是任务里写清了关注点
- 任务的完成标准与格式的可核对性最不能省,因为它们直接决定输出能不能被程序消费
Key points
- Role sets perspective; task sets the goal and done-criteria; format makes output mechanically checkable; constraints bound scope with reasons
- Each element removes one kind of guess the model would otherwise make
- Role is the most droppable once task and format are specific enough to imply the perspective
- Done-criteria and checkable format are the least negotiable because downstream code depends on them