面试题库
共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。
课程全部30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师5 天提示词工程零基础Claude 高效使用:从对话到 Claude CodeCodex 与 OpenAI Agents SDK 高效使用7 天 MCP:把工具接进任何 Agent7 天 Agent Skills:把经验做成可复用能力5 天上下文工程14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答14 天用 Agent 搭一条 AI 短剧生产线
标签
全部#retrieval1#evaluation8#architecture3#chunking3#embeddings3#ingestion3#agentic-rag2#cost2#debugging2#failure-modes2#hybrid-search2#observability2
还有 47 个标签收起标签
#ranking2#abstention1#access-control1#bm251#caching1#citation-verification1#citations1#content-hash1#contextual-retrieval1#cost-optimization1#data-quality1#dimensions1#engineering-judgement1#fallback1#golden-set1#grounding1#hallucination1#hnsw1#hyde1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#intent-routing1#invalidation1#ivfflat1#metadata1#model-selection1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#prioritization1#production-readiness1#quantization1#query-transformation1#rag1#rank-fusion1#recall1#refusal1#reliability1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retrieval-quality1#self-reflection1#trade-offs1#vector-database1#vector-index1
14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答
D7 第一周综合:把六天的零件装成一个可一键启动的检索问答服务并复盘
摄取链路和查询链路应该共享哪些代码?强行复用会带来什么具体问题?What should the ingestion path and the query path share, and what concretely goes wrong when you over-share?
国内高频海外高频进阶#architecture#ingestion#retrieval分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 题眼在「强行」两个字。面试官想看的是你能不能说出复用的边界,而不是背诵「不要重复自己」。
- 先说清两条链路的性质差异:摄取是批处理,几十秒跑完,失败重跑一遍就行;查询是在线请求,几百毫秒要出结果,失败用户当场看到。错误处理、超时、并发策略天然不同。
- 所以结论是:**共享接口,不共享流程**。两边唯一该共享的是存储层的那个接口,以及 embedding 的函数签名——注意后者共享的是签名和模型选择,不是调用流程。
- 给出强行复用的具体症状:抽出来的公共模块里开始出现 isIngest 这类分支,一个改动要同时验证两条链路,最后没人敢动它。
- 补一条真正必须一致的东西:给块算向量和给问题算向量必须用同一个模型。这不是复用代码,是复用配置——而且要把模型名写进向量表,否则模型换了没人发现,检索会静默地返回垃圾。
- 可预期的追问:那切块逻辑呢?查询侧压根不切块,所以它只属于摄取链路;真要在查询侧用到(比如 D11 的父子回填),走的也是存储层读回大块,不是把切块器搬过来。
How to reason about it · think before answering
- The word to notice is 'over-share'. The interviewer wants the boundary, not a recital of DRY.
- Start from how the two paths differ. Ingestion is batch: tens of seconds, and a failure just means rerunning it. Query is online: hundreds of milliseconds, and a failure is visible to the user immediately. Error handling, timeouts and concurrency are simply not the same problem.
- Hence the rule: share the interface, not the flow. The only genuinely shared thing is the storage interface, plus the embedding function signature.
- Name the symptom of over-sharing: the extracted module fills up with isIngest branches, every change has to be verified on both paths, and eventually nobody dares touch it.
- Add the one thing that truly must match: chunks and queries must be embedded by the same model. That is shared configuration, not shared code, and the model name belongs in the vector table so a silent mismatch is detectable.
- Expected follow-up: what about chunking? The query path never chunks. Even when it needs a parent block, it reads it back through storage rather than importing the chunker.
答题要点
- 共享接口不共享流程:唯一的交界是存储层,加上 embedding 的函数签名。
- 两条链路的错误处理与延迟约束根本不同,批处理可以重跑,在线请求必须快速失败。
- 强行复用的症状是公共模块里长出 isIngest 分支,改一次要验两条链路。
- 必须一致的是模型选择而不是代码:块与查询要用同一个 embedding 模型,并把模型名记进向量表。
- 切块只属于摄取;查询侧需要大块时通过存储层读回,而不是把切块器搬过去。
Key points
- Share the interface, not the flow: storage is the only boundary, plus the embedding signature.
- The two paths have different error handling and latency budgets; batch can rerun, online must fail fast.
- Over-sharing shows up as isIngest branches and changes that must be verified twice.
- What must match is the model choice, not the code: record the model name alongside every stored vector.
- Chunking belongs to ingestion only; the query path reads larger units back through storage.