面试题库
共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。
课程全部30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师5 天提示词工程零基础Claude 高效使用:从对话到 Claude CodeCodex 与 OpenAI Agents SDK 高效使用7 天 MCP:把工具接进任何 Agent7 天 Agent Skills:把经验做成可复用能力5 天上下文工程14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答14 天用 Agent 搭一条 AI 短剧生产线
标签
全部#prompt-template1#evaluation30#cost29#reliability24#architecture22#agent-skills21#security18#observability15#streaming12#error-handling11#idempotency10#system-design10
还有 361 个标签收起标签
#api-design9#coding-agent9#distributed-systems8#multi-agent8#rag8#chunking7#debugging7#pipeline-design7#structured-output7#agent-loop6#mcp6#operations6#prompt-injection6#sse6#tool-calling6#tool-design6#context5#context-engineering5#deployment5#embeddings5#hybrid-search5#message-bus5#scheduling5#system-prompt5#agentic-rag4#behavioral4#client4#concurrency4#consistency4#framework-design4#ingestion4#prompt-engineering4#rate-limiting4#retrieval4#routing4#trade-offs4#abstention3#agents-sdk3#caching3#communication3#context-window3#cost-control3#data-quality3#failure-modes3#image-generation3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#latency3#llm-as-judge3#long-context3#model-migration3#model-routing3#orchestration3#ordering3#progressive-disclosure3#prompt-basics3#prompt-caching3#protocol3#provider-abstraction3#ranking3#recall3#redis-streams3#responses-api3#resume3#retry3#runtime3#scalability3#skills3#state-management3#statelessness3#subagents3#timeline3#versioning3#workflow-engine3#access-control2#agent-design2#async-task2#auth2#checkpointing2#citation-verification2#citations2#claude-md2#code-review2#compaction2#context-rot2#contextual-retrieval2#cost-tradeoff2#data-modeling2#database2#distribution2#fallback2#ffmpeg2#golden-set2#grounding2#interview-process2#llm-basics2#long-term-memory2#media-pipeline2#memory2#multi-hop2#multi-tenancy2#oauth2#prioritization2#project-storytelling2#prompt-techniques2#query-rewriting2#react2#refusal2#reproducibility2#rerank2#retrieval-quality2#retrospective2#scripts2#sharding2#state-machine2#tool-permissions2#tooling2#tools2#tracing2#transport2#tts2#ux2#vector-database2#verification2#workflow2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#agent-sdk1#agents-md1#altitude1#analytics1#approvals1#architecture-review1#async1#atomicity1#attention-budget1#av-sync1#backoff1#bi-encoder1#bm251#budget-control1#build-vs-buy1#cancellation1#candidate-selection1#capacity-planning1#career1#chain-of-thought1#ci1#circuit-breaker1#claude-code1#cli-design1#client-integration1#cloud1#compliance1#compression1#configuration1#confused-deputy1#consistent-hashing1#content-hash1#content-safety1#context-assembly1#context-compression1#context-management1#copyright1#coreference1#correctness1#cost-accounting1#cost-analysis1#cost-optimization1#cross-encoder1#cross-model1#customer-support1#dag1#decision-making1#decomposition1#degradation1#deliberate-practice1#design1#diagnostics1#dimensions1#docker1#documentation1#embedding-migration1#encoding1#engineering-judgement1#engineering-tradeoffs1#error-propagation1#escalation1#eval1#event-driven1#evidence1#failure-analysis1#fairness1#faithfulness1#fan-out1#feedback-loop1#fencing-token1#few-shot1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#fine-tuning1#forking1#four-elements1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#graph-rag1#guardrails1#hallucination1#handoff1#handoffs1#headless1#hnsw1#hooks1#human-in-the-loop1#hybrid1#hyde1#incremental-recompute1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#instruction-hierarchy1#integration1#intent-routing1#interrupt-merge1#invalidation1#isolation1#iterative-scan1#ivfflat1#json-parsing1#json-schema1#just-in-time1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#labeling1#latency-budget1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-output-quality1#long-session1#loop-guard1#maintenance1#mcp-basics1#mental-model1#messages-api1#metadata1#methodology1#metrics1#migration1#mobile1#model-selection1#moderation1#modularity1#multi-turn1#multimodal1#nodejs1#normalisation1#notifications1#ocr1#offline-testing1#openai1#overlap1#pagination1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#performance1#permissions1#persistence1#pgvector1#pipeline-reliability1#portfolio1#primitives1#priority-queue1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#production-readiness1#prompt1#prompt-assembly1#prompt-bloat1#prompt-design1#prompt-limits1#prompt-surface1#prompt-versioning1#prompting1#protocol-versions1#quality1#quality-check1#quantization1#query-transformation1#quiet-hours1#rag-basics1#rank-fusion1#reasoning1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retry-semantics1#retry-strategy1#review1#risk-assessment1#rollback1#rollout1#rrf1#safety1#sandbox1#sandboxing1#scaling1#schema-design1#schema-validation1#scoping1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#self-reflection1#server-design1#service-architecture1#session-management1#sessions1#similarity1#skill-authoring1#skill-description1#skill-design1#spec1#split-brain1#stakeholder-communication1#star1#state-persistence1#stateless1#stdio-transport1#stopping-criteria1#storytelling1#subagent1#subscriptions1#subtitles1#task-graph1#team-governance1#test-set1#test-strategy1#testing1#thresholds1#timezone1#token-accounting1#token-budget1#tool-budget1#tool-execution1#tool-naming1#tool-schema1#trust-boundary1#tuning1#validation1#vector-index1#workflow-design1#xml-tags1#zero-downtime1
5 天提示词工程零基础
D3 结构化输出:JSON schema、模板与变量、多语言输出
提示词模板里哪些内容该做成变量,哪些该写死?变量多了会有什么问题?In a prompt template, what should become a variable and what should stay constant, and what goes wrong when you have too many variables?
国内高频海外高频进阶#prompt-template#structured-output分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 这题看起来是设计题,实际在考「有没有维护过一份跑在生产里的提示词」。没维护过的人会把所有能变的都做成变量,觉得灵活;维护过的人知道每个变量都是一条测试维度。
- 拆法:判据只有一条——下一次调用还会一样的是常量,可能不一样的是变量。角色、任务、约束、schema 通常是常量;输入文本、输出语言、团队默认值是变量。
- 再答代价:每多一个变量,提示词的可能形态多一个维度,测试集要覆盖的组合翻倍;变量之间还可能互相影响(语言变量与格式说明冲突)。所以变量越少越好,只取过一个值的「变量」应该变回常量。
- 结论:模板是一个有名字、有参数签名的函数,变量是它的参数,常量是函数体;这样提示词才有身份,才能版本化、才能写测试。
- 追问:多语言应该是变量还是多份模板?变量——只有一份模板,语言只影响给人读的字段,枚举与标识符不跟着变;否则改一条规则要改多份,三个月后一定分叉。
How to reason about it · think before answering
- It looks like a design question but really asks whether you have maintained a prompt in production. The untested instinct is to parameterize everything; experience teaches that every variable is a test dimension.
- One rule: what stays the same on the next call is a constant, what may differ is a variable. Role, task, constraints and schema are usually constants; input text, output language and team defaults are variables.
- Then the cost: each variable adds a dimension to the space of prompts, doubling the combinations a test set must cover, and variables can interact. Fewer is better; a variable that only ever took one value should become a constant.
- Conclusion: the template is a named function with a signature; variables are parameters, constants are the body. That identity is what makes versioning and testing possible.
- Follow-up: is multi-language a variable or separate templates? A variable — one template, language affects only human-facing fields, enums and identifiers never change; separate copies drift within months.
答题要点
- 判据:下一次调用还一样的是常量,可能不一样的是变量
- 角色、任务、约束、schema 是常量;输入文本、输出语言、默认值是变量
- 每个变量都是一条测试维度,变量越少越好,只取过一个值的变回常量
- 多语言是一个变量,只影响给人读的字段,枚举与标识符不变
Key points
- Rule: same on the next call means constant, may differ means variable
- Role, task, constraints and schema are constants; input text, output language and defaults are variables
- Every variable is a test dimension, so keep them minimal and fold single-valued ones back into constants
- Multi-language is one variable affecting only human-facing fields; enums and identifiers stay fixed