面试题库
共 328 题,当前筛选 1 题。
课程全部30 天从前端工程师到 Agent 工程师5 天提示词工程零基础Claude 高效使用:从对话到 Claude CodeCodex 与 OpenAI Agents SDK 高效使用7 天 MCP:把工具接进任何 Agent7 天 Agent Skills:把经验做成可复用能力5 天上下文工程14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答14 天用 Agent 搭一条 AI 短剧生产线
标签
全部#prompting1#evaluation30#cost29#reliability24#architecture22#agent-skills21#security18#observability15#streaming12#error-handling11#idempotency10#system-design10
还有 359 个标签收起标签
#api-design9#coding-agent9#distributed-systems8#multi-agent8#rag8#chunking7#debugging7#pipeline-design7#structured-output7#agent-loop6#mcp6#operations6#prompt-injection6#sse6#tool-calling6#tool-design6#context5#context-engineering5#deployment5#embeddings5#hybrid-search5#message-bus5#scheduling5#system-prompt5#agentic-rag4#behavioral4#client4#concurrency4#consistency4#framework-design4#ingestion4#prompt-engineering4#rate-limiting4#retrieval4#routing4#trade-offs4#abstention3#agents-sdk3#caching3#communication3#context-window3#cost-control3#data-quality3#failure-modes3#image-generation3#interview-prep3#langgraph3#latency3#llm-as-judge3#llm-basics3#long-context3#model-migration3#model-routing3#orchestration3#ordering3#progressive-disclosure3#prompt-basics3#prompt-caching3#protocol3#provider-abstraction3#ranking3#recall3#redis-streams3#responses-api3#resume3#retry3#runtime3#scalability3#skills3#state-management3#statelessness3#subagents3#timeline3#versioning3#workflow-engine3#access-control2#agent-design2#async-task2#auth2#checkpointing2#citation-verification2#citations2#claude-md2#code-review2#compaction2#context-rot2#contextual-retrieval2#cost-tradeoff2#data-modeling2#database2#distribution2#fallback2#ffmpeg2#golden-set2#grounding2#interview-process2#long-term-memory2#media-pipeline2#memory2#multi-hop2#multi-tenancy2#oauth2#prioritization2#project-storytelling2#prompt-techniques2#query-rewriting2#react2#refusal2#reproducibility2#rerank2#retrieval-quality2#retrospective2#scripts2#sharding2#state-machine2#tool-permissions2#tooling2#tools2#tracing2#transport2#tts2#ux2#vector-database2#verification2#workflow2#agent-basics1#agent-quality1#agent-sdk1#agents-md1#altitude1#analytics1#approvals1#architecture-review1#async1#atomicity1#attention-budget1#av-sync1#backoff1#bi-encoder1#bm251#budget-control1#build-vs-buy1#cancellation1#candidate-selection1#capacity-planning1#career1#chain-of-thought1#ci1#circuit-breaker1#claude-code1#cli-design1#client-integration1#cloud1#compression1#configuration1#confused-deputy1#consistent-hashing1#content-hash1#content-safety1#context-assembly1#context-compression1#context-management1#coreference1#correctness1#cost-accounting1#cost-analysis1#cost-optimization1#cross-encoder1#cross-model1#customer-support1#dag1#decision-making1#decomposition1#degradation1#deliberate-practice1#design1#diagnostics1#dimensions1#docker1#documentation1#embedding-migration1#encoding1#engineering-judgement1#engineering-tradeoffs1#error-propagation1#escalation1#eval1#event-driven1#evidence1#failure-analysis1#fairness1#faithfulness1#fan-out1#feedback-loop1#fencing-token1#few-shot1#filter-pushdown1#filtering1#fine-tuning1#forking1#four-elements1#framework-selection1#frontend1#global-market1#graph-rag1#guardrails1#hallucination1#handoff1#handoffs1#headless1#hnsw1#hooks1#human-in-the-loop1#hybrid1#hyde1#incremental-recompute1#incremental-sync1#index-maintenance1#index-routing1#indexing1#information-retrieval1#instruction-hierarchy1#integration1#intent-routing1#interrupt-merge1#invalidation1#isolation1#iterative-scan1#ivfflat1#json-parsing1#json-schema1#just-in-time1#jwt1#knowledge-organization1#latency-budget1#lease1#least-privilege1#llm-output-quality1#long-session1#loop-guard1#maintenance1#mcp-basics1#mental-model1#messages-api1#metadata1#methodology1#metrics1#migration1#mobile1#model-selection1#moderation1#modularity1#multi-turn1#multimodal1#nodejs1#normalisation1#notifications1#ocr1#offline-testing1#openai1#overlap1#pagination1#parent-child1#pdf-parsing1#performance1#permissions1#persistence1#pgvector1#pipeline-reliability1#portfolio1#primitives1#priority-queue1#proactive-messaging1#product-engineering1#production-readiness1#prompt1#prompt-assembly1#prompt-bloat1#prompt-design1#prompt-limits1#prompt-surface1#prompt-template1#prompt-versioning1#protocol-versions1#quality1#quality-check1#quantization1#query-transformation1#quiet-hours1#rag-basics1#rank-fusion1#reasoning1#reconnect1#redis1#reflection1#replay1#reporting1#retrieval-failure1#retrieval-metrics1#retry-semantics1#retry-strategy1#review1#risk-assessment1#rollback1#rollout1#rrf1#safety1#sampling1#sandbox1#sandboxing1#scaling1#schema-design1#schema-validation1#scoping1#secrets-management1#self-assessment1#self-introduction1#self-presentation1#self-reflection1#server-design1#service-architecture1#session-management1#sessions1#similarity1#skill-authoring1#skill-description1#skill-design1#spec1#split-brain1#stakeholder-communication1#star1#state-persistence1#stateless1#stdio-transport1#stopping-criteria1#storytelling1#subagent1#subscriptions1#subtitles1#task-graph1#team-governance1#test-set1#test-strategy1#testing1#thresholds1#timezone1#token-accounting1#token-budget1#tool-budget1#tool-execution1#tool-naming1#tool-schema1#trust-boundary1#tuning1#validation1#vector-index1#workflow-design1#xml-tags1#zero-downtime1
14 天 RAG:从检索到可信回答
D12 Agentic RAG:把检索做成工具,让模型自己决定查不查、查几次、要不要推翻重来
把检索包成一个工具交给模型,这个工具的描述该怎么写?写不好会导致哪些具体的错误行为?You are exposing retrieval to a model as a tool. How do you write the tool description, and what concrete failure modes appear when you write it badly?
国内高频海外高频基础#tool-design#agentic-rag#prompting分析过程 · 先想清楚再作答
- 这题的题眼是「具体的错误行为」。只会背「描述要写清楚工具的用途」的,一句话就暴露了没上过线——面试官想听的是描述里少一句话,线上就多一类工单。
- 先给结构:一段合格的工具描述要回答四件事——库里有什么和没有什么、什么时候必须用、什么时候不要用、查询串写成什么形状。四条各对应一类事故,逐条挂钩着说最有说服力。
- 逐条挂钩:不写范围,模型拿它当搜索引擎,问天气也去查;不写「必须用」,涉及公司制度的问题被模型凭记忆编答案,而且编得非常像真的;不写「不要用」,闲聊和翻译都触发一次无谓检索,成本和延迟白涨;不写查询形状,模型把用户整句问话塞进 query,「叫什么名字」这种疑问词进了检索,纯噪声。
- 最后一条最值钱也最容易漏:在描述里加一句「写成关键词短语,不要带疑问词」,比在检索侧做十种查询清洗都管用——问题在源头,就在源头修。
- 补一个生产视角:参数里的过滤字段(比如部门)要写明「只在确定时才填」。模型倾向于把可选参数填满,填错一个部门就把正确答案挡在库外,而这种错误在日志里看不出来,表现是「检索没结果」。
- 可预期的追问是「怎么验证描述写对了」。答案是拿一批负样本跑:闲聊、翻译、算术、以及答案已在对话里的追问,看模型有没有多调一次工具;这类回归是能自动化的。
How to reason about it · think before answering
- The discriminator is whether you can name concrete failure modes. Reciting 'the description should be clear' signals you have never shipped one.
- Give the structure first: a usable description answers four things - what is and is not in the corpus, when the tool must be called, when it must not be called, and what shape the query string should take.
- Attach a failure to each: no scope and the model treats it as a web search; no 'must call' and it answers policy questions from memory, convincingly; no 'must not call' and greetings or translations each burn a retrieval; no query shape and the model pastes the raw user sentence in, dragging interrogative words into the index.
- The query-shape line is the cheapest win: one sentence saying 'keyword phrase, no question words' beats ten heuristics for query cleaning on the retrieval side.
- Production angle: optional filter parameters such as department need an explicit 'only set this when you are certain'. Models like to fill optional fields, and a wrong filter hides the correct answer while the logs only show 'no results'.
- Expected follow-up: how do you verify the description works? Run a negative suite - small talk, translation, arithmetic, follow-ups already answered in the conversation - and assert the tool was not called. That regression is automatable.
答题要点
- 描述是写给模型看的提示词,不是注释;四段式:范围、什么时候用、什么时候不用、查询写成什么形状。
- 不写范围会被当成搜索引擎;不写「必须用」会导致凭记忆编答案。
- 不写「不要用」会让闲聊也触发检索,成本和延迟白涨。
- 写明查询要用关键词短语、不带疑问词,比在检索侧清洗查询更根本。
- 可选过滤参数要写「只在确定时才填」,填错会静默地把正确答案挡在外面。
- 用一批负样本(闲聊、翻译、算术)做回归,断言工具没有被调用。
Key points
- The description is a prompt for the model, not a code comment: scope, when to call, when not to call, query shape.
- Missing scope turns it into a web search; missing 'must call' produces confident answers from memory.
- Missing 'do not call' makes small talk trigger retrieval, paying cost and latency for nothing.
- Stating 'keyword phrase, no question words' fixes query pollution at the source.
- Optional filters need 'only set when certain' - a wrong filter silently hides the right answer.
- Regression-test with a negative suite and assert the tool was not invoked.